i don't understand why google can indexed goeshare's artcicle so fast.Just 5 minutes.It is so amazing.Maybe it is because i releases 4~6 posts every day.So,google robo always come to index my new article.
For example this post:CSS clear property introduction
This post:Facebook was made to strengthen the Privacy administration
2009年8月30日星期日
2009年7月29日星期三
Testfreaks:A excellent web2.0 style product test website
“TestFreaks have been growing rapidly during 2008 and have now around 4 million monthly users. In the fall of last year we scaled up the organization to sustain further rapid growth, however the global recession have had an impact on consumers buying less home electronics and other more expensive capital goods. This have also had an impact on our growth that during 2009 have been lower than planned. We are therefore reducing the team to a similar size as we had last fall. However, it is not a “Founder team”, we still have 8 employees in our HQ and global team in total of 35 people.”
freakhead_big
Testfreaks, a Swedish based product reviewing site has slowly been gathering attention. It caught our eye from ArcticIndex. Testfreaks can be summed up to be the aggregator of review sites. It pulls in material from more than 4000 sources from 27 markets and aggregates those into one rank – Freak Score.
Testfreaks has been put together by the founders of Pricerunner.com, Kristofer Arwin, Magnus Wiberg and Martin Alexanderson. The founders have therefore plenty of experience from the online shopping market, which Testfreaks is in also. Their business model is to get small commissions from sales done through their links. This sort of model understandably needs traffic. Last October they had about 2 million visits a month, and according to Anton they currently roll around 4M visits a month. Testfreaks has also received a $3 million investment from Northzone last year, according to VentureBeat.
There is plenty of competition in the social shopping market at the moment. In TestFreak’s case however, they mainly work with many of the other shopping sites to bring value for everyone. According to Anton Kuhta, who we had a little chat about the TestFreak site, they usually partner with at least one shopping site on each market to give their users the best possible price. They also work with other review sites – this is because TestFreaks brings in a lot of traffic to these sites so many want to work with them.
Perhaps companies that fall close by with TestFreaks at least from Finland are RunToShop and Fruugo. Both are some sort of aggregators and have similar kind of business models. It will be interesting to see how these companies will perform in the long run as social shopping is still an area that has yet proven itself. There’s definitely a need for more collaboration among these companies world wide – there are untapped benefits for sure.
How do you see this part of the social shopping market? Do you use sites such as TestFreaks when making purchase decisions? http://www.goeshare.com/2009/05/30/testfreaksa-excellent-web20-style-product-test-website/
freakhead_big
Testfreaks, a Swedish based product reviewing site has slowly been gathering attention. It caught our eye from ArcticIndex. Testfreaks can be summed up to be the aggregator of review sites. It pulls in material from more than 4000 sources from 27 markets and aggregates those into one rank – Freak Score.
Testfreaks has been put together by the founders of Pricerunner.com, Kristofer Arwin, Magnus Wiberg and Martin Alexanderson. The founders have therefore plenty of experience from the online shopping market, which Testfreaks is in also. Their business model is to get small commissions from sales done through their links. This sort of model understandably needs traffic. Last October they had about 2 million visits a month, and according to Anton they currently roll around 4M visits a month. Testfreaks has also received a $3 million investment from Northzone last year, according to VentureBeat.
There is plenty of competition in the social shopping market at the moment. In TestFreak’s case however, they mainly work with many of the other shopping sites to bring value for everyone. According to Anton Kuhta, who we had a little chat about the TestFreak site, they usually partner with at least one shopping site on each market to give their users the best possible price. They also work with other review sites – this is because TestFreaks brings in a lot of traffic to these sites so many want to work with them.
Perhaps companies that fall close by with TestFreaks at least from Finland are RunToShop and Fruugo. Both are some sort of aggregators and have similar kind of business models. It will be interesting to see how these companies will perform in the long run as social shopping is still an area that has yet proven itself. There’s definitely a need for more collaboration among these companies world wide – there are untapped benefits for sure.
How do you see this part of the social shopping market? Do you use sites such as TestFreaks when making purchase decisions? http://www.goeshare.com/2009/05/30/testfreaksa-excellent-web20-style-product-test-website/
The review of Firefox 4.0
They’re only mockups, but they show the direction that Web browsers are headed, and it’s definitely a case of less being more.
Mozilla has posted to its wiki early concept designs for Firefox 4.0, and they show a Web browser doing its best to get out of the way of the pages it displays. The interface is decidedly minimal, giving more room for what really matters: content.In the first of several mockups of the Windows version of Firefox 4.0, the browser page tabs are in the usual place, atop the page viewer, but other buttons have been absorbed, with only the most important left on the interface.
In the second, the tabs are placed over the address bar, similar to the layout found in Chrome and the last beta of Safari 4. (In the final version of Safari 4, Apple returned to the more traditional tab location.)
In fact, users of Chrome and Safari will recognize a lot of design elements from those browsers,such as placing the refresh and stop-loading buttons in the address bar. But who knows how the final version will ultimately turn out? These are, after all, just mockups, posted for discussion.
Still, the overall trend is toward a minimalistic interface. And Stephen Shankland, writing in CNet’s Webware blog, appreciates that browser developers are giving him more Web-page real estate:
Mozilla’s ultimate goal is to make the user interface step into the background as much as possible — indeed, the mobile-phone version of Firefox now under development has no visible user interface until it’s needed. “Every time a user has to think about how to do something, instead of what (he wants) to do, we as software creators have failed,” said Aza Raskin, Mozilla’s leader of user interface work.
But it’s not simple to redesign the browsers. Users can be confused when interfaces change, some controls are essential, and hiding them can cause problems.
“The challenge to reducing UI (user interface) is in recognition versus recall. People generally use what they see,” Raskin said. “How can we provide one-click access to everything possible on the Web without also cluttering the screen? That’s a question we are still answering.”
I like these changes, but I also like the convenience of having buttons I use frequently at the ready — which is one reason why I really like the Ribbon interface on the newer versions of Microsoft Office.
Hopefully, Firefox’s interface will remain highly customizable in future versions, so individual users can have it their way.
How do you like your browser interface? Lean, or with all the right tools at your disposal?
http://www.goeshare.com/2009/07/29/meet-the-firefox-of-the-future/
Mozilla has posted to its wiki early concept designs for Firefox 4.0, and they show a Web browser doing its best to get out of the way of the pages it displays. The interface is decidedly minimal, giving more room for what really matters: content.In the first of several mockups of the Windows version of Firefox 4.0, the browser page tabs are in the usual place, atop the page viewer, but other buttons have been absorbed, with only the most important left on the interface.
In the second, the tabs are placed over the address bar, similar to the layout found in Chrome and the last beta of Safari 4. (In the final version of Safari 4, Apple returned to the more traditional tab location.)
In fact, users of Chrome and Safari will recognize a lot of design elements from those browsers,such as placing the refresh and stop-loading buttons in the address bar. But who knows how the final version will ultimately turn out? These are, after all, just mockups, posted for discussion.
Still, the overall trend is toward a minimalistic interface. And Stephen Shankland, writing in CNet’s Webware blog, appreciates that browser developers are giving him more Web-page real estate:
Mozilla’s ultimate goal is to make the user interface step into the background as much as possible — indeed, the mobile-phone version of Firefox now under development has no visible user interface until it’s needed. “Every time a user has to think about how to do something, instead of what (he wants) to do, we as software creators have failed,” said Aza Raskin, Mozilla’s leader of user interface work.
But it’s not simple to redesign the browsers. Users can be confused when interfaces change, some controls are essential, and hiding them can cause problems.
“The challenge to reducing UI (user interface) is in recognition versus recall. People generally use what they see,” Raskin said. “How can we provide one-click access to everything possible on the Web without also cluttering the screen? That’s a question we are still answering.”
I like these changes, but I also like the convenience of having buttons I use frequently at the ready — which is one reason why I really like the Ribbon interface on the newer versions of Microsoft Office.
Hopefully, Firefox’s interface will remain highly customizable in future versions, so individual users can have it their way.
How do you like your browser interface? Lean, or with all the right tools at your disposal?
http://www.goeshare.com/2009/07/29/meet-the-firefox-of-the-future/
2009年5月19日星期二
Is Twitter a Google Killer?
Warning: today's column is strictly editorial, so those of you looking for actionable tips might want to check back in next week.
I have been reading a lot about the impending demise of Google for months, even years now. Most recently, it's Twitter search that's expected to push into Google's marketshare.
I pay attention to these things, and because of my involvement in the industry, I guess I'm probably an early adopter (earlier than the typical person). But, because of my years in the SEO Industry, I'm also not one to have knee-jerk reactions when it comes to strategy. I have to be considerate of the long term, while not ignoring the short term.
Let me back up first and provide a little personal history.
My initial involvement in the Interactive industry came when I started working at Lycos, back in early 2000. At that time, Lycos was a pretty big player in search, with both lycos.com and hotbot.com. There was much discussion at the time as to who would be the remaining "Big 3" that would eventually win the search wars. Mind you, the search engines that were considered at that time were Lycos, AOL, MSN, Yahoo, AltaVista, and Excite.
Search back then was the wild frontier. Search was spam-riddled. Keyword stuffing was the norm in search engine optimization. Users would need to click through many pages of search results to try and find exactly what it was that they were looking for. Then, along came a little company called Google. Google had figured out how to deliver much higher quality search results, and delivered them in a very clean interface.
As time has passed, Google has gotten even better at addressing any "spam" issues, and the results have continued to get better and better. Still, though, the methodology of search engine optimization was that you needed to get a page indexed, get links to it, and let it sit for a while, until the search engines would begin to index the page and rank it.
No more.
Google addressed this, too.
Today's Google results are a blend of web results, press release/news results, video results, local results and blog results. I even recently added a Google profile. Instantly, there I was in the search results for people searching "Mark Jackson" on Google. Often, my Search Engine Watch column or blog posts on my company's blog will show in Google's Blog results within the hour for people searching "search engine optimization" on Google.
With our A.D.D. society, a one-hour wait for "fresh" search results doesn't seem to be good enough. No, people want better than that. They want "instant" search. In fact, they want others to do the searching for them. So, they use Twitter search.
A lot of people seem to be jumping on this bandwagon. Now, I am saying this here...I retain the right to change my mind on this, but this is how I'm currently seeing things.
People are trusting Twitter search, and their Twitter friend's opinions (and the blog posts that they link to) more than they are trusting Google's algorithm? What's easier to spam?
I do have some friends that I trust (people that I actually KNOW, not just people that follow me on Twitter or that I happen to follow). And, I do value their opinions. And, I would trust their opinions more than conducting blind searches on Google. So, I think that what is going on with Twitter search is the beginning of something, but there are just too many "bugs" to get worked out for this to be a Google killer, at least in the short term.
There is talk that in the future, to gain "authority" in Twitter and hence "optimize" the search results, you will need to have a lot of followers, post often, and get ReTweeted. Check out this topic on WebmasterWorld. If Twitter Search begins crawling links in your tweets, and assigning reputation points to users, with some new-fashioned SEO, your Tweets will begin ranking highly in Twitter search for your keywords.
You wanna know what else? There are ways to automate a lot of this process. Or, you could do like Guy Kawasaki (and many others) and hire people to post Tweets for you.
So, even though you might trust Guy Kawasaki's opinions, are you really hearing directly from him? Or, someone working for him?
Matt Cutts and his team deserve a lot of credit for what they've been able to accomplish at Google with cleaning up spam. Right now, Twitter Search is just too easy to manipulate. One thing that my years in the SEO industry have taught me is that users want spam-free results, and the good search engines are the ones who find ways to counter those trying to manipulate the results. The easier a search engine is to manipulate, the less likely it is to deliver quality results.
Once someone develops a method of bringing aspects of social into web results that are not easily manipulated, you might then have the tool that delivers quality, fresh results.
From searchenginewatch
I have been reading a lot about the impending demise of Google for months, even years now. Most recently, it's Twitter search that's expected to push into Google's marketshare.
I pay attention to these things, and because of my involvement in the industry, I guess I'm probably an early adopter (earlier than the typical person). But, because of my years in the SEO Industry, I'm also not one to have knee-jerk reactions when it comes to strategy. I have to be considerate of the long term, while not ignoring the short term.
Let me back up first and provide a little personal history.
My initial involvement in the Interactive industry came when I started working at Lycos, back in early 2000. At that time, Lycos was a pretty big player in search, with both lycos.com and hotbot.com. There was much discussion at the time as to who would be the remaining "Big 3" that would eventually win the search wars. Mind you, the search engines that were considered at that time were Lycos, AOL, MSN, Yahoo, AltaVista, and Excite.
Search back then was the wild frontier. Search was spam-riddled. Keyword stuffing was the norm in search engine optimization. Users would need to click through many pages of search results to try and find exactly what it was that they were looking for. Then, along came a little company called Google. Google had figured out how to deliver much higher quality search results, and delivered them in a very clean interface.
As time has passed, Google has gotten even better at addressing any "spam" issues, and the results have continued to get better and better. Still, though, the methodology of search engine optimization was that you needed to get a page indexed, get links to it, and let it sit for a while, until the search engines would begin to index the page and rank it.
No more.
Google addressed this, too.
Today's Google results are a blend of web results, press release/news results, video results, local results and blog results. I even recently added a Google profile. Instantly, there I was in the search results for people searching "Mark Jackson" on Google. Often, my Search Engine Watch column or blog posts on my company's blog will show in Google's Blog results within the hour for people searching "search engine optimization" on Google.
With our A.D.D. society, a one-hour wait for "fresh" search results doesn't seem to be good enough. No, people want better than that. They want "instant" search. In fact, they want others to do the searching for them. So, they use Twitter search.
A lot of people seem to be jumping on this bandwagon. Now, I am saying this here...I retain the right to change my mind on this, but this is how I'm currently seeing things.
People are trusting Twitter search, and their Twitter friend's opinions (and the blog posts that they link to) more than they are trusting Google's algorithm? What's easier to spam?
I do have some friends that I trust (people that I actually KNOW, not just people that follow me on Twitter or that I happen to follow). And, I do value their opinions. And, I would trust their opinions more than conducting blind searches on Google. So, I think that what is going on with Twitter search is the beginning of something, but there are just too many "bugs" to get worked out for this to be a Google killer, at least in the short term.
There is talk that in the future, to gain "authority" in Twitter and hence "optimize" the search results, you will need to have a lot of followers, post often, and get ReTweeted. Check out this topic on WebmasterWorld. If Twitter Search begins crawling links in your tweets, and assigning reputation points to users, with some new-fashioned SEO, your Tweets will begin ranking highly in Twitter search for your keywords.
You wanna know what else? There are ways to automate a lot of this process. Or, you could do like Guy Kawasaki (and many others) and hire people to post Tweets for you.
So, even though you might trust Guy Kawasaki's opinions, are you really hearing directly from him? Or, someone working for him?
Matt Cutts and his team deserve a lot of credit for what they've been able to accomplish at Google with cleaning up spam. Right now, Twitter Search is just too easy to manipulate. One thing that my years in the SEO industry have taught me is that users want spam-free results, and the good search engines are the ones who find ways to counter those trying to manipulate the results. The easier a search engine is to manipulate, the less likely it is to deliver quality results.
Once someone develops a method of bringing aspects of social into web results that are not easily manipulated, you might then have the tool that delivers quality, fresh results.
From searchenginewatch
2009年5月9日星期六
本站预祝天下母亲母亲节快乐
看看时间，已经是星期天的凌晨1点07分了。今天已经是母亲节了，在这个世界欢庆的母亲节到来之际，我祝福天下的母亲快乐，幸福，儿孙满堂。又乱说话了~~~
谷百优的money昨天去了听胡宝介老师的网络营销课，内容还是相当丰富，虽然内容都是面对新手。但是还是获益匪浅~~网络营销这门课程还得是多实战，多实践，没有人可以单纯依靠理论就可以获得好的成绩。
就说到这里吧，祝福完天下母亲之后，当然要祝福我的母亲啦~~我希望我的母亲长命百岁，延年益寿~~好像把我母亲说得好老那样，晕~~~才50岁~~应该说龙精虎猛，精神抖擞~~哎~~我的语文功底真是有问题，用词相当粗糙~~
就说到这里吧~~
谷百优上
转载注明来自谷百优
有点无聊~~不知道要做什么~还得更新
谷百优工作室又来跟大家更新了~~更新纯粹是为了更新，并无它意~~所以这篇文章注定内容是少点，大家不要介意~~今天是母亲节，我希望天下的母亲都快乐幸福，健康欢乐~~
文章不想再更新了，看看时间都1点25分了，再不睡就要倒下了~~今天去了华工听胡老师的课，长途跋涉，还是挺累的~~晚安了朋友
2009年4月30日星期四
ClickEquations This Weekend
A new upgraded version of ClickEquations will be available next week. More details about the new features and enhancements will be posted here on Monday.
In preparation, we’ll be doing some work on our servers over the next few days.
Here’s what you can expect:
- ClickEquations Manager will be disabled Friday May 1, at approx. 5pm EST. It should be re-activated late on Saturday May 2nd.
- ClickEquations Reporting will be down for a few hours on Saturday afternoon May 2.
To keep up-to-date on any changes to this expected schedule, and all future service upgrades and interruptions, clients should follow our new client-only twitter stream @CQstatus (www.twitter.com/cqstatus).
This is a ‘protected-updates’ twitter account so after you submit a follow request, send us an email to support@clickequations.com with your twitter name and we’ll approve you.
We’ve got some great and frequently-requested new features and improvements to roll-out next week. Please check back Monday to learn all about them.
订阅：
评论 (Atom)